Phitides v. Phitides

750 So. 2d 166, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1143, 2000 WL 145134
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 11, 2000·No. No. 1D99-771·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final order refusing to modify child custody, ordering the parties to attend counseling, and granting the former wife’s request for attorney’s fees. Three issues are raised on appeal, only one of which has merit: Whether the trial court made insufficient factual findings to support the award of attorney’s fees. See Hamlin v. Hamlin, 722 So.2d 851, 852 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). We, therefore, reverse the award of attorney’s fees and remand for the trial court to hold further proceedings on this issue.

MINER, WOLF and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phitides v. Phitides, 750 So. 2d 166, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1143, 2000 WL 145134 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

750 So. 2d 166 (Phitides v. Phitides) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hamlin v. Hamlin
722 So. 2d 851 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)