Phipps v. State

295 S.W.3d 600, 2009 WL 3849678

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Phipps v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1626 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 27, 2009·No. WD 70281·Published

Opinion

295 S.W.3d 600 (2009)

No. WD 70281.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

October 27, 2009.

Rosalynn Koch, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang and Dora A. Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

*601 Before ALOK AHUJA, P.J., JAMES M. SMART, JR., and LISA WHITE HARDWICK, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

Damon Phipps appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

295 S.W.3d 600 (2009)

No. WD 70281.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

October 27, 2009.

Rosalynn Koch, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang and Dora A. Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

*601 Before ALOK AHUJA, P.J., JAMES M. SMART, JR., and LISA WHITE HARDWICK, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

Damon Phipps appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Phipps v. State, 295 S.W.3d 600, 2009 WL 3849678 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

295 S.W.3d 600 (Phipps v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

295 S.W.3d 600 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)