Phipps v. State
860 S.W.2d 1, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 650, 1993 WL 137761
Opinion
ORDER
Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion. We find the motion court did not clearly err in such denial. Rule 84.-16(b)(2).
We further find an opinion in this case would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been prepared for use by the parties only.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phipps v. State, 860 S.W.2d 1, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 650, 1993 WL 137761 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).
860 S.W.2d 1 (Phipps v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.