Phipps v. Phipps

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Phipps v. Phipps

41 A.D.2d 523, 339 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5254

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 23, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 41 A.D.2d 523 (Phipps v. Phipps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phipps v. Phipps, 41 A.D.2d 523, 339 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5254 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Resettled order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 15, 1972, unanimously modified, on the law and the facte, to reduce temporary alimony to $500 per week, and to direct that plaintiff conserve certain documents so that they should be available at the trial, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Considering the relatively short duration of this marriage, and the age, condition and earning ability of the defendant wife, we consider that an award of $500 per week would provide adequate support pending trial. Special Term ordered plaintiff to turn over to defendant certain letters, diaries and other documents. As these were her property, the direction was proper, but as plaintiff has shown he will seek to use them on the trial, it is directed that defendant keep said documents intact and be in a position to produce them at the trial. Concur —Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Resettled order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 15, 1972, unanimously modified, on the law and the facte, to reduce temporary alimony to $500 per week, and to direct that plaintiff conserve certain documents so that they should be available at the trial, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Considering the relatively short duration of this marriage, and the age, condition and earning ability of the defendant wife, we consider that an award of $500 per week would provide adequate support pending trial. Special Term ordered plaintiff to turn over to defendant certain letters, diaries and other documents. As these were her property, the direction was proper, but as plaintiff has shown he will seek to use them on the trial, it is directed that defendant keep said documents intact and be in a position to produce them at the trial. Concur —Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A.D.2d 523, 339 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phipps-v-phipps-nyappdiv-1973.