Phipps v. Harlan
This text of 53 Cal. 87 (Phipps v. Harlan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order denying a new trial affirmed as to the defendants Harlan, Maulsbury, Brown, Fowler, and Swope. Remittitur forthwith.
The judgment as to the defendant Watson reversed for want of a finding upon the affirmative defense set up in his answer, and as to him the cause is remanded with directions to make an additional finding upon the said affirmative defense, and thereupon to proceed to judgment as to the said defendant Watson. Remittitur forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 Cal. 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phipps-v-harlan-cal-1878.