Phipps v. Harlan

53 Cal. 87
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1878
DocketNo. 5852
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 53 Cal. 87 (Phipps v. Harlan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phipps v. Harlan, 53 Cal. 87 (Cal. 1878).

Opinion

By the-Court:

Judgment and order denying a new trial affirmed as to the defendants Harlan, Maulsbury, Brown, Fowler, and Swope. Remittitur forthwith.

The judgment as to the defendant Watson reversed for want of a finding upon the affirmative defense set up in his answer, and as to him the cause is remanded with directions to make an additional finding upon the said affirmative defense, and thereupon to proceed to judgment as to the said defendant Watson. Remittitur forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bordeaux v. Bordeaux
75 P. 524 (Montana Supreme Court, 1904)
Wilson v. Wilson
57 P. 708 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1899)
San Diego Land & Town Co. v. Neale
3 L.R.A. 83 (California Supreme Court, 1888)
Lake v. Bender
18 Nev. 361 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1884)
Cassidy v. Cassidy
63 Cal. 352 (California Supreme Court, 1883)
McCourtney v. Fortune
57 Cal. 617 (California Supreme Court, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 Cal. 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phipps-v-harlan-cal-1878.