Phipps v. Harlan
53 Cal. 87
Opinion
Judgment and order denying a new trial affirmed as to the defendants Harlan, Maulsbury, Brown, Fowler, and Swope. Remittitur forthwith.
The judgment as to the defendant Watson reversed for want of a finding upon the affirmative defense set up in his answer, and as to him the cause is remanded with directions to make an additional finding upon the said affirmative defense, and thereupon to proceed to judgment as to the said defendant Watson. Remittitur forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phipps v. Harlan, 53 Cal. 87 (Cal. 1878).
53 Cal. 87 (Phipps v. Harlan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bordeaux v. Bordeaux
75 P. 524 (Montana Supreme Court, 1904)
Wilson v. Wilson
57 P. 708 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1899)
San Diego Land & Town Co. v. Neale
3 L.R.A. 83 (California Supreme Court, 1888)
Lake v. Bender
18 Nev. 361 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1884)
Cassidy v. Cassidy
63 Cal. 352 (California Supreme Court, 1883)
McCourtney v. Fortune
57 Cal. 617 (California Supreme Court, 1881)