Phipps v. Gulf Refining Co.
103 S.E. 472, 25 Ga. App. 384, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 820
Opinion
The court did not err in directing a verdict for the defendant.
Judgment on main hill of exceptions affirmed; cross-hill dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phipps v. Gulf Refining Co., 103 S.E. 472, 25 Ga. App. 384, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 820 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).
103 S.E. 472 (Phipps v. Gulf Refining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Aetna Casualty C. Company v. Daniel
55 S.E.2d 854 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Daniel
80 Ga. App. 383 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Helms v. Sinclair Refining Co.
170 F.2d 289 (Fifth Circuit, 1948)
Cowart v. Jordan
44 S.E.2d 804 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Phillips v. Davidson
24 F. Supp. 184 (E.D. South Carolina, 1938)
Indemnity Insurance v. Lamb
193 S.E. 76 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Sinclair Refining Co. v. Veal
181 S.E. 705 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Roberts v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
157 S.E. 537 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Gulf Refining Co. v. William Wilkinson
114 So. 503 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
Sams v. Arthur
133 S.E. 205 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1926)
Gulf Refining Co. v. Harris
117 S.E. 274 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)