Phipps v. Board of Adjustment

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Phipps v. Board of Adjustment

388 So. 2d 317

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 17, 1980

Docket79-1920

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 388 So. 2d 317 (Phipps v. Board of Adjustment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phipps v. Board of Adjustment, 388 So. 2d 317 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

388 So.2d 317 (1980)

Michael PHIPPS, Robert A. Ware and Robert Tansill, Appellants,
v.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, a Board of Review Created by the Ordinances of Palm Beach County, Lee Starkey, Chairman of the Board of Adjustment; Jan Wolfe, Warren Newell, Nathaniel Adams and Horace Pepper, As Members of the Board of Adjustment, Appellees.

No. 79-1920.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

September 17, 1980.

Robert A. Ware, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Charles F. Schoech, Asst. County Atty., West Palm Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants have filed a notice of appeal from an order of the circuit court, sitting in its review capacity, denying their petition for writ of certiorari. Pursuant to Fla.R. App.P. 9.040(c) and 9.030(b)(2)(B) we treat this proceeding as one seeking our writ of common law certiorari.

Petitioners have failed to demonstrate that the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law. Accordingly, the petition is denied.

CERTIORARI DENIED.

ANSTEAD, MOORE and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI