Phinney v. First American National Bank
This text of 10 F. App'x 555 (Phinney v. First American National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Don Ray Phinney appeals the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of his RICO claims. The district court properly dismissed Phinney’s claims against Judges Echols and Wiseman based on their absolute immunity for acts taken in a judicial capacity. See Moore v. Brewster, 96 F.3d 1240, 1243-44 (9th Cir.1996); Atkinson-Baker & Assoc., Inc. v. Kolts, 7 F.3d 1452, 1454-55 (9th Cir.1993) (per curiam). Phinney’s claims against the other defendants are barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Therefore, dismissal was warranted as to them as well. See Nordhom v. Ladish Co., Inc., 9 F.3d 1402, 1404 (9th Cir.1993).
Phinney also appeals the entry of a vexatious litigant order against him. The district court did not abuse its discretion in entering this order. See DeLong v. Hennessey, 912 F.2d 1144, 1147-48 (9th Cir.1990).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the [556]*556courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 F. App'x 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phinney-v-first-american-national-bank-ca9-2001.