Phinizy v. Phinizy
114 S.E. 193, 154 Ga. 217, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 332
Opinion
This court having reversed the judgment of the trial court refusing to grant a new trial on a motion excepting to the rendition of the first verdict in the case, it becomes unnecessary to pass upon the questions raised in this bill of exceptions; and this case is remanded to the court below, with instruction to vacate the second verdict and the decree rendered.
■Judgment affirmed, mth direction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phinizy v. Phinizy, 114 S.E. 193, 154 Ga. 217, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 332 (Ga. 1922).
114 S.E. 193 (Phinizy v. Phinizy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Cantwell
8 A.2d 533 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1939)