Phinazee v. Godard

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Phinazee v. Godard

92 S.E. 1014, 20 Ga. App. 262, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 854

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 15, 1917

Docket8580

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 92 S.E. 1014 (Phinazee v. Godard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phinazee v. Godard, 92 S.E. 1014, 20 Ga. App. 262, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 854 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

George, J.

In order for this court to review the refusal of a judge of the superior court to sanction a certiorari, the petition for certiorari must he incorporated in the hill of exceptions, or be verified as a part thereof by the trial judge; an unsanctioned petition can not be specified as a part of the record. Taylor v. Omega, 12 Ga. App. 693 (78 S. E. 144), and cit.; Wood v. County of Tattnall, 115 Ga. 1000 (42 S. E. 403), and cit.

Writ of error dismissed.

Wade, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Petition for certiorari; from Monroe superior court—Judge Searcy. February 5, 1917.

J. M. Smith, for plaintiff in error. A.- M. Zellner, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI