Phinazee v. Godard

92 S.E. 1014, 20 Ga. App. 262, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 854
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 15, 1917·No. 8580·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

George, J.

In order for this court to review the refusal of a judge of the superior court to sanction a certiorari, the petition for certiorari must he incorporated in the hill of exceptions, or be verified as a part thereof by the trial judge; an unsanctioned petition can not be specified as a part of the record. Taylor v. Omega, 12 Ga. App. 693 (78 S. E. 144), and cit.; Wood v. County of Tattnall, 115 Ga. 1000 (42 S. E. 403), and cit.

Writ of error dismissed.

Wade, O. J., and Luke, J., concur. Petition for certiorari; from Monroe superior court—Judge Searcy. February 5, 1917. J. M. Smith, for plaintiff in error. A.- M. Zellner, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phinazee v. Godard, 92 S.E. 1014, 20 Ga. App. 262, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 854 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

92 S.E. 1014 (Phinazee v. Godard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reynolds v. State
71 S.E.2d 103 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)