Philpotts v. City of Norfolk

Norfolk County Circuit Court

Philpotts v. City of Norfolk

18 Va. Cir. 19, 1988 Va. Cir. LEXIS 311

Norfolk County Circuit Court·Decided April 11, 1988·No. Case No. (Law) L-87-1242·Published

Opinion

By JUDGE THOMAS R. McNAMARA

Upon the rationale of Judge Markow in his opinion letter of February 3, 1987, to counsel in the cases of Betty J. Eldridge v. City of Richmond and Charles J. Eldridge v. City of Richmond, the motion of defendant Norfolk Festevents, Ltd., to dismiss and for summary judgment in its favor as an eleemosynary institution immune from damage suits based upon negligence in operations will be sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By JUDGE THOMAS R. McNAMARA

Upon the rationale of Judge Markow in his opinion letter of February 3, 1987, to counsel in the cases of Betty J. Eldridge v. City of Richmond and Charles J. Eldridge v. City of Richmond, the motion of defendant Norfolk Festevents, Ltd., to dismiss and for summary judgment in its favor as an eleemosynary institution immune from damage suits based upon negligence in operations will be sustained.

Philpotts v. City of Norfolk, 18 Va. Cir. 19, 1988 Va. Cir. LEXIS 311 (Va. Super. Ct. 1988).

Pincite

18 Va. Cir. 19 (Philpotts v. City of Norfolk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.