Philpotts v. City of Norfolk

Norfolk County Circuit Court

Philpotts v. City of Norfolk

18 Va. Cir. 19, 1988 Va. Cir. LEXIS 311

CourtNorfolk County Circuit Court

DecidedApril 11, 1988

DocketCase No. (Law) L-87-1242

StatusPublished

This text of 18 Va. Cir. 19 (Philpotts v. City of Norfolk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Norfolk County Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Philpotts v. City of Norfolk, 18 Va. Cir. 19, 1988 Va. Cir. LEXIS 311 (Va. Super. Ct. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

By JUDGE THOMAS R. McNAMARA

Upon the rationale of Judge Markow in his opinion letter of February 3, 1987, to counsel in the cases of Betty J. Eldridge v. City of Richmond and Charles J. Eldridge v. City of Richmond, the motion of defendant Norfolk Festevents, Ltd., to dismiss and for summary judgment in its favor as an eleemosynary institution immune from damage suits based upon negligence in operations will be sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By JUDGE THOMAS R. McNAMARA

Upon the rationale of Judge Markow in his opinion letter of February 3, 1987, to counsel in the cases of Betty J. Eldridge v. City of Richmond and Charles J. Eldridge v. City of Richmond, the motion of defendant Norfolk Festevents, Ltd., to dismiss and for summary judgment in its favor as an eleemosynary institution immune from damage suits based upon negligence in operations will be sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 Va. Cir. 19, 1988 Va. Cir. LEXIS 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philpotts-v-city-of-norfolk-vaccnorfolk-1988.