Philpot v. Webb

20 Ind. 509
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1863
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 20 Ind. 509 (Philpot v. Webb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Philpot v. Webb, 20 Ind. 509 (Ind. 1863).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Henry G. Waggoner died in 1859, then owning certain real estate, and he left surviving him Matilda Waggoner, his widow, and Eliza J. Philpot and several others,' his children by said Matilda, being his heirs at law.

Afterward,in September, 1860, said Matilda executed, jointly and severally, with William Henderson, two promissory notes, amounting in the aggregate to 866 dollars and 66 cents, payable to George W. Webb. Later, to-wit, in November, 1860, the widow, Matilda, intermarried with said Henderson; and, on the 20th of March following, (1861), she died, leaving- surviving her no children by her second husband.

On the 6th of June, 1862, Webb, the payee of the above mentioned notes, instituted this suit to enforce payment of them out of the interest of said Matilda in the real estate of her first husband, she having left no other property, and Henderson being insolvent, The suit is against her children by her first husband, the heirs of Henry G. Waggoner, deceased. It is alleged that there is no administrator.

The Court held that one-third of the real estate of her first husband, Waggoner, descended to the said Matilda, in fee; that her subsequent marriage did not divest it; and that at her death it descended to her heirs, liable to be sold for debtB contracted by her.

Concurring in the opinion of the Court below, we affirm the judgment, with costs.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Herring v. Keneipp
107 N.E. 76 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1914)
Herring v. Keneipp
92 N.E. 742 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1910)
Forgy v. Davenport
45 N.E. 592 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1896)
Davis v. Kelly
31 N.E. 942 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1892)
Schlemmer v. Rossler
59 Ind. 326 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1877)
Williams v. Venner
53 Ind. 396 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1876)
Small v. Roberts
51 Ind. 281 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1875)
Murphy v. Henry
35 Ind. 442 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1871)
Jackson v. Finch
27 Ind. 316 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1866)
Goodrich v. Myers
25 Ind. 10 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1865)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Ind. 509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philpot-v-webb-ind-1863.