Philpot v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Philpot v. State

1935 OK CR 147, 50 P.2d 1150, 58 Okla. Crim. 187, 1935 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 136

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 8, 1935

DocketNo. A-8953.

StatusPublished

This text of 1935 OK CR 147 (Philpot v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Philpot v. State, 1935 OK CR 147, 50 P.2d 1150, 58 Okla. Crim. 187, 1935 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 136 (Okla. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of robbery with firearms, and his punishment assessed at twenty-five years in the state penitentiary.

A copy of the record and case-made was filed in this court on the 8th day of July, 1985. No brief has been filed in support of the defendant’s assignment of errors.

A careful examination of the record fails to disclose any fundamental or prejudicial errors. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict.

The case is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of robbery with firearms, and his punishment assessed at twenty-five years in the state penitentiary.

A copy of the record and case-made was filed in this court on the 8th day of July, 1985. No brief has been filed in support of the defendant’s assignment of errors.

A careful examination of the record fails to disclose any fundamental or prejudicial errors. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict.

The case is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1935 OK CR 147, 50 P.2d 1150, 58 Okla. Crim. 187, 1935 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philpot-v-state-oklacrimapp-1935.