Philpot v. District of Columbia
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
RONNECE MARTIN PHILPOT, et al.,
Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 23-671 (AHA-MJS) v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,
Defendant.
Order
Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Sharbaugh issued a report and recommendation in this case
on May 6, 2025. The 14-day period to file written objections has passed and neither party has filed
any objections. See LCvR 72.3(b).
Plaintiff Ronnece Martin Philpot sued the District of Columbia under the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act. ECF No. 1 ¶ 1. Philpot contends that, although the hearing officer
correctly found that the District’s May 2022 individualized education plan for her child, R.P., was
inadequate, the officer erred by finding the District’s June 2021 plan adequate. Id. ¶¶ 29, 32.
According to Philpot, the hearing officer should have ordered private school placement for R.P.
instead of just compensatory education. Id. ¶ 34. Philpot and the District both moved for summary
judgment. ECF Nos. 6, 9. Magistrate Judge Sharbaugh recommended that the Court deny Philpot’s
motion and grant the District’s cross-motion. ECF No. 16 at 1–2.
The Court has reviewed and adopts Magistrate Judge Sharbaugh’s opinion. The Court also
finds that any objections to the report and recommendation have been waived by failure to timely
assert them. See LCvR 72.3(b). The Court accordingly denies Philpot’s motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 6, and
grants the District’s cross-motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 9.
AMIR H. ALI United States District Judge
Date: May 28, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Philpot v. District of Columbia (Philpot v. District of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.