Philpot v. Chattanooga, Rome & Southern Railroad

40 S.E. 266, 114 Ga. 295, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 670
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 11, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 40 S.E. 266 (Philpot v. Chattanooga, Rome & Southern Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Philpot v. Chattanooga, Rome & Southern Railroad, 40 S.E. 266, 114 Ga. 295, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 670 (Ga. 1901).

Opinion

Fish, J.

The plaintiffs having introduced evidence sufficient to sustain a recovery in their favor for some amount, the court erred in granting a nonsuit.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

A. H. Massey, Inc. v. Diamond Electric & Supply Corp.
126 S.E.2d 548 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Smith v. Faulk
156 S.E. 185 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Pendleton Bros. v. Atlantic Lumber Co.
60 S.E. 377 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 S.E. 266, 114 Ga. 295, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philpot-v-chattanooga-rome-southern-railroad-ga-1901.