Philpot v. Chattanooga, Rome & Southern Railroad
40 S.E. 266, 114 Ga. 295, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 670
Opinion
The plaintiffs having introduced evidence sufficient to sustain a recovery in their favor for some amount, the court erred in granting a nonsuit.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Philpot v. Chattanooga, Rome & Southern Railroad, 40 S.E. 266, 114 Ga. 295, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 670 (Ga. 1901).
40 S.E. 266 (Philpot v. Chattanooga, Rome & Southern Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
A. H. Massey, Inc. v. Diamond Electric & Supply Corp.
126 S.E.2d 548 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Smith v. Faulk
156 S.E. 185 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Pendleton Bros. v. Atlantic Lumber Co.
60 S.E. 377 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)