Phillipson v. Ninno
This text of 190 A.D. 967 (Phillipson v. Ninno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Held, in view of the finding of malice [968]*968and want of probable cause, no prejudicial error survives in refusing to dismiss the cause of action for false imprisonment. Damages may be awarded for imprisonment where a case of malicious prosecution is made out. (Sheldon v. Carpenter, 4 N. Y. 579.) All concur, except Lambert and Hubbs, JJ., who dissent upon the ground that it was error for the trial judge to deny the defendant’s motion for a nonsuit as to the first cause of action, for false imprisonment, especially in view of the fact that the jury was instructed that it might award exemplary damages on each cause of action. (Marks v. Townsend, 97 N. Y. 590; Swart v. Rickard, 148 id. 264.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 A.D. 967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillipson-v-ninno-nyappdiv-1920.