Phillips & Warrick v. Adkins

1 White & W. 119
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 9, 1882
DocketNo. 2223, R. Book No. 4, p. 260
StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 119 (Phillips & Warrick v. Adkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phillips & Warrick v. Adkins, 1 White & W. 119 (Tex. Ct. App. 1882).

Opinion

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 292. Jurisdiction. A suit was properly brought in the county in which, by its terms, the written contract was to be performed. [Rev. Stats, art. 1556, subd. 4.]

§ 293. Costs; judgment for, in county court. Where judgment in county court is for less than that obtained in justice’s court, it is error to give judgment for costs of the county court, unless for good cause stated upon the record. [Rev. Stats, arts. 1433, 1434.] Though.reversible error, the cause on appeal to this court will not on that ground alone be remanded, but the judgment will be reformed.

Reversed and reformed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-warrick-v-adkins-texapp-1882.