Phillips v. Yarter

172 A.D. 912, 156 N.Y.S. 875

This text of 172 A.D. 912 (Phillips v. Yarter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phillips v. Yarter, 172 A.D. 912, 156 N.Y.S. 875 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Without entering into an elaborate analysis of the evidence in this case, it may be stated that the plaintiff himself obviously gave false testimony on a material issue involved. This is not even denied and is not satisfactorily explained. Under the circumstances disclosed a judgment.so obtained cannot be permitted to stand without a reflection upon the administration of justice by the courts. The order denying motion for a new trial should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant to abide the event, and motion granted, without costs. All concurred; Cochrane, J., not sitting. Order denying motion for new trial reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant to abide event, and motion granted, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 A.D. 912, 156 N.Y.S. 875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-yarter-nyappdiv-1916.