Phillips v. Wooldridge, Chancellor

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Phillips v. Wooldridge, Chancellor

181 S.W.2d 13, 207 Ark. 867, 1944 Ark. LEXIS 760

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJune 12, 1944

Docket4-7417

StatusPublished

This text of 181 S.W.2d 13 (Phillips v. Wooldridge, Chancellor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phillips v. Wooldridge, Chancellor, 181 S.W.2d 13, 207 Ark. 867, 1944 Ark. LEXIS 760 (Ark. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

McHaney, J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioners are the collateral heirs at law of Guy Keeney who died intestate in Port Smith, Arkansas, in 1939, and they are the defendants in a certain action pending in the Arkansas Chancery Court, Southern District, presided over by respondent, as chancellor, wherein the plaintiffs are three of the collateral heirs at law of the late Angie Merritt Keeney, wife of said Guy Keeney. The action was begun by plaintiffs in said court on December 15,1942, and up to this time, although, after much delay, plaintiffs in said action have taken their testimony by depositions before a stenographer, such depositions have not been transcribed, or if transcribed have not been filed. Several motions of defendants, petitioners here, for dismissal for failure of plaintiffs to take and file their depositions, in accordance with orders of the court so to do, have been overruled. The prayer of the petition for mandamus is that this court direct the respondent to dismiss the action because of the failure of plaintiffs to proceed in an orderly way to bring the case to trial.

On oral argument counsel for the respective parties agreed for this court to award a consent writ of mandamus, to the respondent, directing him to require plaintiffs and their counsel to file their depositions with the clerk of said court on or before June 26, 1944, and, if requested so to do, to issue a rule on the stenographer to compel the transcribing and filing of the depositions for plaintiffs, under penalty of dismissal of the action with prejudice for failure of plaintiffs to file same on or before said date; to require defendants and their counsel to take, have transcribed and filed their depositions in said cause on or before July 24, 1944, under penalty of having, said'cause submitted to' said court for final decision on the testimony of plaintiffs alone; to require plaintiffs to take, transcribe and file any rebuttal testimony they may wish to “take on or before July 31, 1944; and to require a submission of the cause to respondent for final decree-on or before August 7, 1944.

The clerk will issue the writ as directed herein, and the respondent is directed to tax the costs of this proceeding, as certified by the clerk of this court, against the plaintiffs in the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McHaney, J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioners are the collateral heirs at law of Guy Keeney who died intestate in Port Smith, Arkansas, in 1939, and they are the defendants in a certain action pending in the Arkansas Chancery Court, Southern District, presided over by respondent, as chancellor, wherein the plaintiffs are three of the collateral heirs at law of the late Angie Merritt Keeney, wife of said Guy Keeney. The action was begun by plaintiffs in said court on December 15,1942, and up to this time, although, after much delay, plaintiffs in said action have taken their testimony by depositions before a stenographer, such depositions have not been transcribed, or if transcribed have not been filed. Several motions of defendants, petitioners here, for dismissal for failure of plaintiffs to take and file their depositions, in accordance with orders of the court so to do, have been overruled. The prayer of the petition for mandamus is that this court direct the respondent to dismiss the action because of the failure of plaintiffs to proceed in an orderly way to bring the case to trial.

On oral argument counsel for the respective parties agreed for this court to award a consent writ of mandamus, to the respondent, directing him to require plaintiffs and their counsel to file their depositions with the clerk of said court on or before June 26, 1944, and, if requested so to do, to issue a rule on the stenographer to compel the transcribing and filing of the depositions for plaintiffs, under penalty of dismissal of the action with prejudice for failure of plaintiffs to file same on or before said date; to require defendants and their counsel to take, have transcribed and filed their depositions in said cause on or before July 24, 1944, under penalty of having, said'cause submitted to' said court for final decision on the testimony of plaintiffs alone; to require plaintiffs to take, transcribe and file any rebuttal testimony they may wish to “take on or before July 31, 1944; and to require a submission of the cause to respondent for final decree-on or before August 7, 1944.

The clerk will issue the writ as directed herein, and the respondent is directed to tax the costs of this proceeding, as certified by the clerk of this court, against the plaintiffs in the court below.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 S.W.2d 13, 207 Ark. 867, 1944 Ark. LEXIS 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-wooldridge-chancellor-ark-1944.