Phillips v. United States
This text of 49 F. App'x 125 (Phillips v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Paul Michael Phillips appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his post-judgment motion for “a magistrate discovery motion hearing” and his “notice of procedural discordance.” We agree with the district court that Phillips is not entitled to the relief which he requested, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order of April 10, 2002.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 F. App'x 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-united-states-ca9-2002.