Phillips v. Teaneck Township
5 A.2d 698, 122 N.J.L. 485, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 342
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, lor the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Parker, Case, Donges, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phillips v. Teaneck Township, 5 A.2d 698, 122 N.J.L. 485, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 342 (N.J. 1939).
5 A.2d 698 (Phillips v. Teaneck Township) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Odabash v. MAYOR AND COUN. DUMONT
319 A.2d 712 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1974)
Itzen & Robertson v. Bd. of Health of Oakland
215 A.2d 60 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1965)
Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Town of Westfield
110 A.2d 148 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
Sieber v. Laawe
109 A.2d 470 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
Conlon v. BD. OF PUBLIC WORKS, CITY OF PATERSON
94 A.2d 660 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1953)
Baris Lumber Co., Inc. v. Town of Secaucus
90 A.2d 130 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
Lionshead Lake, Inc. v. Tp. of Wayne
80 A.2d 650 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Campbell v. Hillsdale
79 A.2d 321 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Lionshead Lake, Inc. v. Wayne Tp.
73 A.2d 287 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)