Phillips v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Phillips v. State

229 S.W.2d 364, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2338

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Phillips v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 152 Tex. Crim. 612 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 18, 1950·No. No. 24426·Published

Opinion

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The original opinion by this Court is withdrawn and the following substituted in lieu thereof.

Appellant was convicted for selling horse meat for human consumption and was assessed a fine of $200. The facts of the [365]*365case are similar to those in Neill v. State, Tex.Cr.R., 229 S.W.2d 361 this day decided, and the question of law as to the effect of the new statute is the same. There is no other question in this record which requires discussion and, ■ for the reasons stated in the Neill case,'the judgment in this cause is now affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The original opinion by this Court is withdrawn and the following substituted in lieu thereof.

Appellant was convicted for selling horse meat for human consumption and was assessed a fine of $200. The facts of the [365]*365case are similar to those in Neill v. State, Tex.Cr.R., 229 S.W.2d 361 this day decided, and the question of law as to the effect of the new statute is the same. There is no other question in this record which requires discussion and, ■ for the reasons stated in the Neill case,'the judgment in this cause is now affirmed.

Phillips v. State, 229 S.W.2d 364, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2338 (Tex. 1950).

Pincite

229 S.W.2d 364 (Phillips v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related