Phillips v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Phillips v. State

197 S.W. 988, 81 Tex. Crim. 658, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 250

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Phillips v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 86 Tex. Crim. 624 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 28, 1917·No. No. 4339.·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

This conviction was for violation of article 303, P. C., wherein appellant was convicted for exhibiting in a place of amusement a moving picture show on Sunday.

The majority of the court have held the law constitutional and valid in the Zucarro case, this day decided. I do not believe the decision correctly decides the law, but the majority have held the other way, and in obedience to their finding this judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

This conviction was for violation of article 303, P. C., wherein appellant was convicted for exhibiting in a place of amusement a moving picture show on Sunday.

The majority of the court have held the law constitutional and valid in the Zucarro case, this day decided. I do not believe the decision correctly decides the law, but the majority have held the other way, and in obedience to their finding this judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Phillips v. State, 197 S.W. 988, 81 Tex. Crim. 658, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 250 (Tex. 1917).

Pincite

197 S.W. 988 (Phillips v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.