Phillips v. State

322 S.W.3d 634, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1354, 2010 WL 3971312
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 12, 2010·No. ED 93426·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dwayne A. Phillips, Jr. appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for ■our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phillips v. State, 322 S.W.3d 634, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1354, 2010 WL 3971312 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

322 S.W.3d 634 (Phillips v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Monia v. Monia
322 S.W.3d 634 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)