Phillips v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Phillips v. State

862 S.W.2d 517, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1582, 1993 WL 402921

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Phillips v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 994 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 12, 1993·No. No. 62731·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Jerome Phillips, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.036 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The judgments of conviction sought to be vacated were for two counts of assault in the first degree, unlawful use of a weapon, and armed criminal action. Movant was sentenced as a prior and persis[518]*518tent and class X offender to concurrent terms of imprisonment of life, 20 years, ten years, and 30 years.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Jerome Phillips, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.036 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The judgments of conviction sought to be vacated were for two counts of assault in the first degree, unlawful use of a weapon, and armed criminal action. Movant was sentenced as a prior and persis[518]*518tent and class X offender to concurrent terms of imprisonment of life, 20 years, ten years, and 30 years.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16.

Phillips v. State, 862 S.W.2d 517, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1582, 1993 WL 402921 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

862 S.W.2d 517 (Phillips v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.