Phillips v. State

236 S.E.2d 519, 142 Ga. App. 581, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1709
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 26, 1977
Docket53831
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 236 S.E.2d 519 (Phillips v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phillips v. State, 236 S.E.2d 519, 142 Ga. App. 581, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1709 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

Quillian, Presiding Judge.

The defendant appeals his conviction for burglary. Held:

1. The first enumeration of error complains of the failure to charge Code § 38-414 regarding a confession by a joint offender or conspirator. The facts show that a co-conspirator did make a "statement”; however, no such "statement” was introduced into evidence. Instead, the co-conspirator testified as to the defendant’s involvement in the criminal enterprise.

Code § 38-414 has no application and need not be charged "in a case in which no confession of a joint offender or conspirator is offered, but where such joint offender or conspirator is sworn and testifies as a witness.” Pippin v. State, 205 Ga. 316 (12) (53 SE2d 482). Accord, Brown v. State, 132 Ga. App. 200 (2) (207 SE2d *582 682).

Submitted May 9, 1977 Decided May 26, 1977 Rehearing denied June 20, 1977 Gilberg, Kraselsky & Owens, Larry B. Owens, for appellant. William S. Lee, District Attorney, Hobart M. Hind, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

2. The evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict. Adkins v. State, 138 Ga. App. 349, 350 (226 SE2d 137), citing Brown v. State, 232 Ga. 838 (209 SE2d 180), and Self v. State, 108 Ga. App. 201 (4) (132 SE2d 548).

3. The defendant urges that the court erred in failing to charge, without request, the definition and types of possession.

The contention is without merit. " 'A correct instruction to the jury is not subject to exception for failure, in absence of an appropriate request, to embody an additional definitive or explanatory charge.’ ” Griffin v. State, 195 Ga. 368, 371, 372 (24 SE2d 399). Accord, Crowe v. State, 37 Ga. App. 828 (4) (142 SE 306); Dobbs v. State, 214 Ga. 206 (104 SE2d 121).

Judgment affirmed.

Shulmán and Banke, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
425 S.E.2d 382 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Oliver v. State
282 S.E.2d 767 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Brownlee v. State
273 S.E.2d 875 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Talbott v. State
251 S.E.2d 126 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Holland v. State
240 S.E.2d 161 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 S.E.2d 519, 142 Ga. App. 581, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-state-gactapp-1977.