Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Phillips v. State

Phillips v. State

77 S.E. 832, 12 Ga. App. 563, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 642
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 2, 1913·No. 4663·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pottle, J.

There was direct evidence that whisky was delivered by an agent of the accused. Whether a sale was intended or consummated depended upon circumstantial evidence. It was, therefore, not error to charge the law relating to both direct and circumstantial evidence. The conviction was warranted. Judgment affirmed.

Accusation of sale of liquor; from city court of Jefferson— Judge Johns. January 7, 1913. Bay & Bay, for plaintiff in error. P. Cooley, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phillips v. State, 77 S.E. 832, 12 Ga. App. 563, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 642 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

77 S.E. 832 (Phillips v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Griffeth v. State
71 S.E.2d 789 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Shivers v. State
183 S.E. 489 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)