Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Phillips v. State

Phillips v. State

77 S.E. 832, 12 Ga. App. 563, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 642
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 2, 1913
Docket4663
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 77 S.E. 832 (Phillips v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phillips v. State, 77 S.E. 832, 12 Ga. App. 563, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 642 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Pottle, J.

There was direct evidence that whisky was delivered by an agent of the accused. Whether a sale was intended or consummated depended upon circumstantial evidence. It was, therefore, not error to charge the law relating to both direct and circumstantial evidence. The conviction was warranted. Judgment affirmed.

Accusation of sale of liquor; from city court of Jefferson— Judge Johns. January 7, 1913. Bay & Bay, for plaintiff in error. P. Cooley, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Griffeth v. State
71 S.E.2d 789 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Shivers v. State
183 S.E. 489 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 S.E. 832, 12 Ga. App. 563, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-state-gactapp-1913.