Phillips v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Phillips v. State

190 Ga. 226

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 14, 1940

DocketNo. 13261

StatusPublished

This text of 190 Ga. 226 (Phillips v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phillips v. State, 190 Ga. 226 (Ga. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Grice, Justice.

The sole assignment of error relating to the overruling of a motion for new trial based on the general grounds only, and an examination of the record disclosing that the evidence was sufficient to support the finding of the jury, and the verdict having received the approval of the trial judge, the judgment refusing a new trial is

Affirmed.

All the Justices concw. A. G. Smith and Claude C. Smith, for plaintiff in error. Ellis G. Arnall, attorney-general, John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, J. W. LeCraw, Daniel L. Duke, Herschel E. Smith and C. E. Gregory Jr., assistant attorneys-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grice, Justice.

The sole assignment of error relating to the overruling of a motion for new trial based on the general grounds only, and an examination of the record disclosing that the evidence was sufficient to support the finding of the jury, and the verdict having received the approval of the trial judge, the judgment refusing a new trial is

Affirmed.

All the Justices concw. A. G. Smith and Claude C. Smith, for plaintiff in error. Ellis G. Arnall, attorney-general, John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, J. W. LeCraw, Daniel L. Duke, Herschel E. Smith and C. E. Gregory Jr., assistant attorneys-general, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 Ga. 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-state-ga-1940.