Phillips v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Phillips v. State

190 Ga. 226

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 14, 1940·No. No. 13261·Published

Opinion

Grice, Justice.

The sole assignment of error relating to the overruling of a motion for new trial based on the general grounds only, and an examination of the record disclosing that the evidence was sufficient to support the finding of the jury, and the verdict having received the approval of the trial judge, the judgment refusing a new trial is

Affirmed.

All the Justices concw. A. G. Smith and Claude C. Smith, for plaintiff in error. Ellis G. Arnall, attorney-general, John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, J. W. LeCraw, Daniel L. Duke, Herschel E. Smith and C. E. Gregory Jr., assistant attorneys-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grice, Justice.

The sole assignment of error relating to the overruling of a motion for new trial based on the general grounds only, and an examination of the record disclosing that the evidence was sufficient to support the finding of the jury, and the verdict having received the approval of the trial judge, the judgment refusing a new trial is

Affirmed.

All the Justices concw. A. G. Smith and Claude C. Smith, for plaintiff in error. Ellis G. Arnall, attorney-general, John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, J. W. LeCraw, Daniel L. Duke, Herschel E. Smith and C. E. Gregory Jr., assistant attorneys-general, contra.

Phillips v. State, 190 Ga. 226 (Ga. 1940).

Pincite

190 Ga. 226 (Phillips v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.