Phillips v. State

84 So. 3d 400, 2012 WL 1020491, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4833
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Phillips v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4311
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 28, 2012·No. No. 2D10-5190·Published

Opinion

VILLANTI, Judge.

Michael Phillips appeals the revocation of his probation and the sentence imposed upon revocation. We affirm the revocation of Phillips’ probation and the sentence imposed after the trial court granted Phillips’ motion to correct sentencing error filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Pro-[401]*401eedure 3.800(b)(2). However, the written order of revocation incorrectly states that Phillips admitted to the violation of his probation. On remand, the trial court shall enter a corrected order of revocation reflecting that Phillips was found to have violated his probation after an evidentiary hearing.

Affirmed but remanded with directions.

DAVIS and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phillips v. State, 84 So. 3d 400, 2012 WL 1020491, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4833 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

84 So. 3d 400 (Phillips v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.