Phillips v. State

809 So. 2d 913, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3301, 2002 WL 398439
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Phillips v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 781 So. 2d 477
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 15, 2002·No. No. 1D00-4254·Published

Opinion

BARFIELD, J.

Appellant has not demonstrated that the Criminal Punishment Code, sections 921.002-921.0026, Florida Statutes (1999), is unconstitutional. See Hall v. State, 773 So.2d 99 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), review granted, 790 So.2d 1104 (Fla. Apr.25, 2001). See also, Peterson v. State, 775 So.2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Hall v. State, 767 So.2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). The trial court properly ruled that appellant, who pled nolo contendere to a third-degree felony and was sentenced to four years in prison, did not have standing to challenge his sentence under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phillips v. State, 809 So. 2d 913, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3301, 2002 WL 398439 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

809 So. 2d 913 (Phillips v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)
Hall v. State
767 So. 2d 560 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Peterson v. State
775 So. 2d 376 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Hall v. State
773 So. 2d 99 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)