Phillips v. State
194 So. 2d 916, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5288
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Phillips v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 177 So. 2d 243 →
Opinion
Affirmed under the authority of Thomas v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 328; Linton v. Cox, 358 F.2d 859 (10th Cir. 1966); and Hamrick v. Boles, 231 F.Supp. 507 (N.D.W.Va.1964). Cf. Mason v. United States, 303 F.2d 775 (9th Cir. 1962).
[917]*917We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phillips v. State, 194 So. 2d 916, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5288 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).
194 So. 2d 916 (Phillips v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
William Carlton Mason v. United States
303 F.2d 775 (Ninth Circuit, 1962)
John R. Linton v. Harold A. Cox, Warden, New Mexico State Penitentiary
358 F.2d 859 (Tenth Circuit, 1966)
Thomas v. State
163 So. 2d 328 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Hamrick v. Boles
231 F. Supp. 507 (N.D. West Virginia, 1964)