Phillips v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Phillips v. State

194 So. 2d 916, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5288

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 8, 1967

DocketNo. 7372

StatusPublished

This text of 194 So. 2d 916 (Phillips v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phillips v. State, 194 So. 2d 916, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5288 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed under the authority of Thomas v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 328; Linton v. Cox, 358 F.2d 859 (10th Cir. 1966); and Hamrick v. Boles, 231 F.Supp. 507 (N.D.W.Va.1964). Cf. Mason v. United States, 303 F.2d 775 (9th Cir. 1962).

[917]*917We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

ALLEN, C. J., and SHANNON and LILES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed under the authority of Thomas v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 328; Linton v. Cox, 358 F.2d 859 (10th Cir. 1966); and Hamrick v. Boles, 231 F.Supp. 507 (N.D.W.Va.1964). Cf. Mason v. United States, 303 F.2d 775 (9th Cir. 1962).

[917]*917We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

ALLEN, C. J., and SHANNON and LILES, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 So. 2d 916, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-state-fladistctapp-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack