Phillips v. State

719 So. 2d 882, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 422, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1484, 1998 WL 608234
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedAugust 20, 1998
DocketNo. 90681
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 719 So. 2d 882 (Phillips v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phillips v. State, 719 So. 2d 882, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 422, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1484, 1998 WL 608234 (Fla. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Phillips v. State, 689 So.2d 453 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), which expressly and directly conflicts with Johnson v. State, 569 So.2d 872 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

In J.B. v. State, 705 So.2d 1376 (Fla.1998), we resolved this conflict, holding that the allowance of a confession or an admission against interest without independent proof of the corpus delicti requires a contemporaneous objection to preserve the issue for appeal. Id. at 1378. Accordingly, we approve the decision below.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, WELLS, ANSTEAD and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MacKerley v. State
754 So. 2d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Brown v. State
719 So. 2d 882 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
719 So. 2d 882, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 422, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1484, 1998 WL 608234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-state-fla-1998.