Phillips v. State

719 So. 2d 882, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 422, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1484, 1998 WL 608234
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided August 20, 1998·No. No. 90681·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Phillips v. State, 689 So.2d 453 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), which expressly and directly conflicts with Johnson v. State, 569 So.2d 872 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

In J.B. v. State, 705 So.2d 1376 (Fla.1998), we resolved this conflict, holding that the allowance of a confession or an admission against interest without independent proof of the corpus delicti requires a contemporaneous objection to preserve the issue for appeal. Id. at 1378. Accordingly, we approve the decision below.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, WELLS, ANSTEAD and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phillips v. State, 719 So. 2d 882, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 422, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1484, 1998 WL 608234 (Fla. 1998).

719 So. 2d 882 (Phillips v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MacKerley v. State
754 So. 2d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Brown v. State
719 So. 2d 882 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)