Phillips v. State
This text of 719 So. 2d 882 (Phillips v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have for review Phillips v. State, 689 So.2d 453 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), which expressly and directly conflicts with Johnson v. State, 569 So.2d 872 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
In J.B. v. State, 705 So.2d 1376 (Fla.1998), we resolved this conflict, holding that the allowance of a confession or an admission against interest without independent proof of the corpus delicti requires a contemporaneous objection to preserve the issue for appeal. Id. at 1378. Accordingly, we approve the decision below.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
719 So. 2d 882, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 422, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1484, 1998 WL 608234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-state-fla-1998.