Phillips v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Phillips v. State

896 S.W.2d 890, 320 Ark. 392, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 253

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMay 1, 1995

DocketCR 95-379

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 896 S.W.2d 890 (Phillips v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phillips v. State, 896 S.W.2d 890, 320 Ark. 392, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 253 (Ark. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant, James Eldridge Phillips, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, Robert Meurer, failed to give timely notice of appeal, and, as a result, the clerk has refused to file the transcript. We will treat this acknowledgment as a motion for belated appeal and grant the motion. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. See Harkness v. State, 264 Ark. 561, 572 S.W.2d 835 (1978).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appellant, James Eldridge Phillips, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, Robert Meurer, failed to give timely notice of appeal, and, as a result, the clerk has refused to file the transcript. We will treat this acknowledgment as a motion for belated appeal and grant the motion. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. See Harkness v. State, 264 Ark. 561, 572 S.W.2d 835 (1978).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

896 S.W.2d 890, 320 Ark. 392, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-state-ark-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack