Phillips v. State
Opinion
We see nothing in the provisions, etc., of Code 1923, § 3216, that prevents the eori *355 tinued and effectual operation of the provisions of Code 1923, § 3212.
This appellant was prosecuted under the provisions of the statute last named; the indictment against him was in the form prescribed by the Code. The demurrers thereto were properly overruled. Code 1923, §§ 3212, 4556 (form 71), 4527.
No bill of exceptions is contained in the record. No other question is apparent.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
146 So. 535 (Phillips v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.