Phillips v. State

146 So. 535, 25 Ala. App. 353, 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 38
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Phillips v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 25 Ala. App. 286
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 28, 1933·No. 8 Div. 781.·Published

Opinion

RICE, Judge.

We see nothing in the provisions, etc., of Code 1923, § 3216, that prevents the eori *355 tinued and effectual operation of the provisions of Code 1923, § 3212.

This appellant was prosecuted under the provisions of the statute last named; the indictment against him was in the form prescribed by the Code. The demurrers thereto were properly overruled. Code 1923, §§ 3212, 4556 (form 71), 4527.

No bill of exceptions is contained in the record. No other question is apparent.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phillips v. State, 146 So. 535, 25 Ala. App. 353, 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 38 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).

146 So. 535 (Phillips v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.