Phillips v. Soule
This text of 75 Mass. 233 (Phillips v. Soule) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On the facts proved in this case we think a waiver of the strict- performance of the original terms of the contract may fairly be inferred, and that the plaintiff is entitled to a conveyance of the land on fulfilling the stipulations on his part to be performed. The conveyance to be made by the intestate to the plaintiff was not of the nature of a condition precedent. The stipulations of the parties respectively were mutual and dependent, and the deed from Herrick to the plaintiff and the mortgage back to Herrick were to be simultaneous acts, Kane v. Hood, 13 Pick. 281.
After the long delay of the plaintiff in bringing his suit for the specific performance of the contract, we think he cannot equitably claim that the administrator shall now receive the [235]*235note and mortgage for the sum due the estate under the contract, but that under the circumstances of the case he is bound to pay it to the administrator in money, on receiving a proper conveyance of the premises. Decree accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
75 Mass. 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-soule-mass-1857.