Phillips v. Social Security Administration

E.D. Oklahoma

Phillips v. Social Security Administration

DecidedJuly 8, 2025

Docket6:25-cv-00065

StatusUnknown

This text of Phillips v. Social Security Administration (Phillips v. Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phillips v. Social Security Administration, (E.D. Okla. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

DAVID LEE PHILLIPS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) Case No. CIV-25-65-GLJ ) FRANK J. BISIGNANO,1 ) Commissioner of the Social ) Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION AND ORDER Defendant, the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner), has filed an unopposed motion with this Court, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to enter a judgment with an order of reversal with remand of the case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Upon consideration, the Court finds Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) [Docket No. 15] should be GRANTED. Accordingly, this Court hereby REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision under Sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with REMAND to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).

1 On May 6, 2025, Frank J. Bisignano became the Commissioner of Social Security. In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), Mr. Bisignano is substituted for Leland Dudek as the Defendant in this action. IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of July 2025.

GERALD L. JACKSON UNITED STATED MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

DAVID LEE PHILLIPS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) Case No. CIV-25-65-GLJ ) FRANK J. BISIGNANO,1 ) Commissioner of the Social ) Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION AND ORDER Defendant, the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner), has filed an unopposed motion with this Court, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to enter a judgment with an order of reversal with remand of the case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Upon consideration, the Court finds Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) [Docket No. 15] should be GRANTED. Accordingly, this Court hereby REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision under Sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with REMAND to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).

1 On May 6, 2025, Frank J. Bisignano became the Commissioner of Social Security. In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), Mr. Bisignano is substituted for Leland Dudek as the Defendant in this action. IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of July 2025.

GERALD L. JACKSON UNITED STATED MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Phillips v. Social Security Administration, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-social-security-administration-oked-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack