Phillips v. Smith

110 Mass. 61
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided September 15, 1872·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Mobtoh, J.

The declaration having been lost, the defendant produced at the trial a copy thereof. If we assume that this copy was proved to the satisfaction of the court, and filed as a part of the record, yet it could not be used or commented on as evidence in the cause. The statute provides that “ neither the declaration, answer, nor any subsequent allegation, shall be deemed evidence on the trial, but allegations only whereby the party making them is bound.” Gen. Sts. c. 129, § 72. This case is governed by Walcott v. Kimball, 13 Allen, 460. Exceptions sustained,.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phillips v. Smith, 110 Mass. 61 (Mass. 1872).

110 Mass. 61 (Phillips v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harrington v. Metropolitan Transit Authority
187 N.E.2d 818 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1963)
Stoney v. Soar
76 N.E.2d 645 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1948)
Herman v. Fine
49 N.E.2d 597 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1943)
Lantry-Sharpe Contracting Co. v. McCracken
134 S.W. 363 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1910)
Demelman v. Burton
57 N.E. 665 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1900)
Barrett v. Featherstone
36 S.W. 245 (Texas Supreme Court, 1896)
Tart v. Fiske
5 N.E. 621 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1885)