Phillips v. Smith

Supreme Court of Florida

Phillips v. Smith

156 So. 260, 116 Fla. 1

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 27, 1934·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case the appeal is from a final decree in foreclosure in which the defense of usury was interposed.

The only question presented by the record for our determination is whether or not there is substantial evidence in the record to sustain the decree.

The case was' referred to a Master to take testimony and to make findings. The Master.found in favor of the complainants. Exceptions were filed to the Master’s report and were overruled by the Chancellor.

We find in the record substantial evidence to support the findings of both the Master and the Chancellor and, *2 therefore, will not disturb the decree, which is now affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur. Davis, C. J., and Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In this case the appeal is from a final decree in foreclosure in which the defense of usury was interposed.

The only question presented by the record for our determination is whether or not there is substantial evidence in the record to sustain the decree.

The case was' referred to a Master to take testimony and to make findings. The Master.found in favor of the complainants. Exceptions were filed to the Master’s report and were overruled by the Chancellor.

We find in the record substantial evidence to support the findings of both the Master and the Chancellor and, *2 therefore, will not disturb the decree, which is now affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur. Davis, C. J., and Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Phillips v. Smith, 156 So. 260, 116 Fla. 1 (Fla. 1934).

Pincite

156 So. 260 (Phillips v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.