Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Phillips v. Rogers

Phillips v. Rogers

112 S.E. 369, 153 Ga. 472, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 105
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 17, 1922
DocketNo. 2900
StatusPublished

This text of 112 S.E. 369 (Phillips v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phillips v. Rogers, 112 S.E. 369, 153 Ga. 472, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 105 (Ga. 1922).

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

The evidence did not authorize the verdict, and the court erred in refusing a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. Joseph T. Davis and Thad..L. Bynum, for plaintiff in error. McMillan & Erwin, B. E. A. Hamby, and W. 8. Paris, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 S.E. 369, 153 Ga. 472, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-rogers-ga-1922.