Phillips v. Phillips
This text of 53 S.E. 457 (Phillips v. Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff demurred to defendant’s plea to an action upon a promissory note under seal, on the ground that the plea was not verified. The demurrer was filed, without notice thereof • being given to the defendant, twelve days after the “demurrer docket” had been regularly called by the court. When the case was called for trial the plaintiff’s counsel announced to the court that there was a demurrer in the ease, and the judge set the trial for a certain date. On the trial the defendant sought to verify his plea, by way of amendment, but the court would not allow him so to do, and rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Meld, that as the judgment was in the breast of the court until the end of the term, it was not error for the court, upon proper motion made during the term at which the judgment was rendered, to vacate the judgment and reinstate the plea. Jordan v. Tarver, 92 Ga. 379; Walton v. Jones, 53 Ga. 91; Shaw v. Watson, 52 Ga. 202.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 S.E. 457, 124 Ga. 912, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-phillips-ga-1906.