Phillips v. Phillips

1 Stew. 71
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 15, 1827·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

THE CHIEF JUSTICE

delivered the opinion of the Court

The plaintiff and defendant were legatees and executors of Francis Phillips. They had settled the accounts of the estate and divided the proceeds, excepting the debt, [72]*72which was the subject of this suit. The action was on a s..., ;ai promise. The plaintiff proved that the deli nclant jjnd admitted that he had collected this debt, and promised tf) j)ay jt over to the plaintiff, and a judgement was rendered for him One executor can maintain ah action against another on an express promise. Let the judgement be affirmed.

Clay and M‘Clung, for plaintiff. Beatoon, for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phillips v. Phillips, 1 Stew. 71 (Ala. 1827).

1 Stew. 71 (Phillips v. Phillips) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Faulkner v. Faulkner
73 Mo. 327 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1880)
Central Railroad v. N. J. West Line Railroad
32 N.J. Eq. 67 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1880)
Chandler v. Shehan
7 Ala. 251 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1845)
Hampton v. Shehan
7 Ala. 295 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1845)