Phillips v. Parnell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Phillips v. Parnell

134 S.E.2d 676, 261 N.C. 410, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 477

DecidedMarch 4, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 134 S.E.2d 676 (Phillips v. Parnell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phillips v. Parnell, 134 S.E.2d 676, 261 N.C. 410, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 477 (N.C. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The pleadings of all parties were direct and concise. They presented clear-cut issues of fact. The evidence consisted of the [412]*412testimony of the plaintiff, the original defendant, and the investigating officer. The controversy in this Court, however, involves only the fourth issue — -the original defendant’s claim for contribution against the additional defendants. The evidence was ample to sustain the jury’s findings.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The pleadings of all parties were direct and concise. They presented clear-cut issues of fact. The evidence consisted of the [412]*412testimony of the plaintiff, the original defendant, and the investigating officer. The controversy in this Court, however, involves only the fourth issue — -the original defendant’s claim for contribution against the additional defendants. The evidence was ample to sustain the jury’s findings.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 S.E.2d 676, 261 N.C. 410, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-parnell-nc-1964.