Phillips v. Nicholas
This text of 3 Blackf. 133 (Phillips v. Nicholas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ERROR to the Rush Circuit Court.
The Supreme Court of the United States 'permitted a remittitur to be entered in a case similar to that in the text. The following is the formal entry:
“Whereupon it is considered, ordered, and adjudged by this Court, that the judgment of the said Circuit Court in this cause be, and the same is hereby affirmed without costs, deducting from the said judgment of the said Circuit Court, the amount so deducted as aforesaid.” Bank of Kentucky v. Ashley et al. 2 Peters, 327.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Blackf. 133, 1832 Ind. LEXIS 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-nicholas-ind-1832.