Phillips v. Montgomery
This text of Phillips v. Montgomery (Phillips v. Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
COURTNEY PHILLIPS PLAINTIFF
v. Case No. 3:21-cv-00238-KGB
DEWEY LYNN MONTGOMERY DEFENDANT
ORDER Before the Court is plaintiff Courtney Phillips’s motion for entry of default (Dkt. No. 3). Ms. Phillips requests that the Clerk enter default in her favor under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) (Id.). Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure contemplates a two-step process for the entry of default judgments. Fraserside IP L.L.C. v. Youngtek Solutions Ltd., 796 F. Supp. 2d 946, 951 (N.D. Iowa 2011) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). First, pursuant to Rule 55(a), the party seeking a default judgment must have the Clerk of Court enter the default by submitting the required proof that the opposing party has failed to plead or otherwise defend. Id. Second, pursuant to Rule 55(b), the moving party may seek entry of judgment on the default under either subdivision (b)(1) or (b)(2) of the rule. Id. Entry of default under Rule 55(a) must precede a grant of default judgment under Rule 55(b). Id. To consider a motion for default under Rule 55(a), the Clerk requires an affidavit or affirmation setting forth proof of service, including the date thereof; a statement that no responsive pleading has been received within the time limit set by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or as fixed by the Court; and a statement that the defendant against whom default is sought is not a minor, incompetent, or in military service as required by 50 U.S.C. § 3931. Ms. Phillips through her counsel previously filed an affidavit of service, but she has not provided a statement regarding defendant Dewey Lynn Montgomery’s minority, incompetency, or military service (Dkt. No. 2). 50 U.S.C. § 3931; Fed. R. Civ. P. 55 (b)(1). Therefore, the Court denies without prejudice Ms. Phillips’s request for entry of default (Dkt. No. 3). Ms. Phillips may refile her motion for Clerk’s entry of default with the required affidavits. It is so ordered this the 11th day of February, 2022.
Kush Pakur— Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Phillips v. Montgomery, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-montgomery-ared-2022.