Phillips v. Logan

18 Cal. App. 287
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedFebruary 21, 1912
DocketCiv. No. 1044
StatusPublished

This text of 18 Cal. App. 287 (Phillips v. Logan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phillips v. Logan, 18 Cal. App. 287 (Cal. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

SHAW, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order of the superior court granting defendant’s motion for a change of the place of trial from Kings county to the county of Napa, wherein she resided at the time of the commencement of the action,

The error in the court’s ruling is based upon the alleged insufficiency of the affidavit of merits made by defendant, wherein it was stated “that affiant has fully and fairly stated the facts of her ease herein to her attorney, ’ ’ by whom she was advised that she had a good and valid defense upon the merits of the action. Upon the authority of Nickerson v. California Raisin Co., 61 Cal. 268, and People v. Larue, 66 Cal. 235, [5 Pac. 157], the court erred in granting the motion. The statement contained in the affidavit of merits that defendant had stated her case was, in effect, saying that she had stated merely her defense.

The order appealed from is reversed.

Allen, P. J., and James, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nickerson v. California Raisin Co.
61 Cal. 268 (California Supreme Court, 1882)
People ex rel. State Bd. of Harbor Comm'rs v. Larue
5 P. 157 (California Supreme Court, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Cal. App. 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-logan-calctapp-1912.