Phillips v. Lipson

20 A.D.2d 926, 249 N.Y.S.2d 685, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3950

This text of 20 A.D.2d 926 (Phillips v. Lipson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phillips v. Lipson, 20 A.D.2d 926, 249 N.Y.S.2d 685, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3950 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

In a proceeding to vacate a subpoena {ad testificandum), the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 11, 1963, which denied his application. Order affirmed, without costs. The examination of the petitioner shall proceed on 10 days’ written notice or on such date and at such place as the parties may mutually fix by written stipulation. The power of the Commissioner of Accounts of the County of Nassau to issue subpoenas is not limited to the issuance of subpoenas duces tecum (Matter of Lipson v. Martling, 20 A D 2d 714; of. CPLR 2302, 2308). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ. concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 A.D.2d 926, 249 N.Y.S.2d 685, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-lipson-nyappdiv-1964.