Phillips v. Koepke
This text of 710 So. 2d 772 (Phillips v. Koepke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendants in a medical malpractice case seek certiorari review of an order denying their motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for plaintiff’s failure to comply with the mandatory presuit requirements, specifically that the verified medical opinion was not from a medical expert as defined by section 766.202(5) Florida Statutes. We deny certio-rari because it is clear that the court did not depart from the essential requirements of law in determining that the affiant’s qualifications met the alternative definition of a [773]*773medical expert. See Fort Walton Beach Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Dingier, 697 So.2d 575 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).
CERTIORARI DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
710 So. 2d 772, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8841, 1998 WL 281747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-koepke-fladistctapp-1998.