Phillips v. Kirby

34 N.W. 855, 73 Iowa 278
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided October 27, 1887·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Adams, Oh. J.

Where the husband gives his individual note for goods purchased and used as family expenses, the cause of action against the wife is not barred until the cause of action upon the note would be barred as against the husband, (Waggoner v. Turner, 69 Iowa, 127,) and this is so where the note has been put in judgment against the husband. (Frost v. Parker, 65 Iowa, 178.) Following those decisions, the judgment must be Ee versed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phillips v. Kirby, 34 N.W. 855, 73 Iowa 278 (iowa 1887).

34 N.W. 855 (Phillips v. Kirby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Apuzzo v. Hoer
4 A.2d 424 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1939)
Dale v. Marvin
148 P. 1116 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1915)
Littell v. Minton
101 Iowa 603 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1897)
Black v. Sippy
16 P. 418 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1888)