Phillips v. Johnny Janoski, Inc., and UIAB

Supreme Court of Delaware

Phillips v. Johnny Janoski, Inc., and UIAB

DecidedDecember 12, 2016

Docket390, 2016

StatusPublished

This text of Phillips v. Johnny Janoski, Inc., and UIAB (Phillips v. Johnny Janoski, Inc., and UIAB) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phillips v. Johnny Janoski, Inc., and UIAB, (Del. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

KATHRYN PHILLIPS, § § No. 390, 2016 Appellant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § C.A. No. S15A-12-004 JOHNNY JANOSIK, INC. and § UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE § APPEALS BOARD, § § Appellees Below, § Appellees. §

Submitted: October 7, 2016 Decided: December 12, 2016

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VAUGHN, and SEITZ, Justices.

ORDER

This 12th day of December 2016, after consideration of the appellant’s

opening brief and the record on appeal,1 we find it evident that the judgment of the

Superior Court should be affirmed on the basis of the court’s letter opinion dated

June 28, 2016.2

1 Johnny Janosik, Inc. (“Johnny Janosik”) did not file an answering brief. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board (“UIAB”) informed the Court that it would not submit an answering brief because it did not take a position on the merits of the case in the Superior Court and that it did not have a cognizable interest in having its rulings sustained as a body acting in a judicial or quasi-judicial capacity. 2 Phillips v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd., 2016 WL 3610803 (Del. June 28, 2016). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

KATHRYN PHILLIPS, § § No. 390, 2016 Appellant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § C.A. No. S15A-12-004 JOHNNY JANOSIK, INC. and § UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE § APPEALS BOARD, § § Appellees Below, § Appellees. §

Submitted: October 7, 2016 Decided: December 12, 2016

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VAUGHN, and SEITZ, Justices.

ORDER

This 12th day of December 2016, after consideration of the appellant’s

opening brief and the record on appeal,1 we find it evident that the judgment of the

Superior Court should be affirmed on the basis of the court’s letter opinion dated

June 28, 2016.2

1 Johnny Janosik, Inc. (“Johnny Janosik”) did not file an answering brief. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board (“UIAB”) informed the Court that it would not submit an answering brief because it did not take a position on the merits of the case in the Superior Court and that it did not have a cognizable interest in having its rulings sustained as a body acting in a judicial or quasi-judicial capacity. 2 Phillips v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd., 2016 WL 3610803 (Del. June 28, 2016). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Justice

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Phillips v. Johnny Janoski, Inc., and UIAB, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-johnny-janoski-inc-and-uiab-del-2016.