Phillips v. Holder

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedJanuary 22, 2015
DocketCivil Action No. 2015-0109
StatusPublished

This text of Phillips v. Holder (Phillips v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phillips v. Holder, (D.D.C. 2015).

Opinion

FILED

JAN 22 2%

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT a“, ".5. District and

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Bankruptcy Courts ) CHERRON MARIE PHILLIPS, ) ) Plaintiff, Case: 1:15—cv-00109 V. Assigned To : Unassigned

Assign. Date: 1/22/2015 . I

ERIC HOLDER, et al., Description: Pro Se Gen. CIVll ) Defendants. ) )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff” 5 application to proceed in forma pauperis and his pro se complaint. The Court will grant the application and dismiss the complaint.

According to the plaintiff, she “is imprisoned without authority and in violation of civil rights promised by the United States . . . .” Compl. at 2. In the guise of a civil rights action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 US 388 (1971), the plaintiff challenges her criminal conviction and sentence and demands an award of monetary damages.

“[A] criminal defendant may not recover damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for ‘harm caused by actions whose unlawfulness would render [her] conviction or sentence invalid’ unless ‘the conviction or sentence has been reversed on direct appeal, expunged by executive order, declared invalid by a state tribunal authorized to make such determination, or called into

question by a federal court’s issuance of a writ of habeas corpus.” Williams v. Hill, 74 F.3d

1339, 1340 (DC. Cir. 1996) (citing Heck v. Humphrey, 512 US. 477, 487 (1994)). “The rationale of Heck applies equally to claims against federal officials in Bivens actions.” Id.

The plaintiff makes no such showing. She does not demonstrate that her conviction or sentence already has been reversed, expunged or invalidated, or that a federal court already has granted her petition for a writ of habeas corpus. This action for damages therefore must be dismissed.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

DATE: W M/ ZwK WU

nited States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robert L. Williams v. Leo C. Hill
74 F.3d 1339 (D.C. Circuit, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Phillips v. Holder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-holder-dcd-2015.